News

A Daughter Reconsiders Her Family's Legacy in 'The Mixed Marriage Project'

Dorothy Roberts, a distinguished legal scholar, recently undertook a profound journey of self-discovery and familial re-evaluation through her new book, 'The Mixed Marriage Project.' This endeavor began with unearthing nearly 500 interview transcripts collected by her late father, Robert Roberts, a white anthropologist, on interracial couples in Chicago. What started as an effort to complete her father's unfinished work evolved into a deeply personal exploration when she discovered her mother, Iris, a Black Jamaican immigrant, had been an uncredited yet crucial contributor to the research, particularly in interviewing the wives. This revelation prompted Roberts to critically examine her parents' mixed-race marriage and her own identity as a Black woman with a white father, offering fresh perspectives on race, love, and the complex dynamics of family in America.

The meticulous research conducted by Robert Roberts involved extensive interviews with interracial couples across Chicago, spanning from the late 1800s to the 1960s. His collection provided a unique window into the social fabric of the city, highlighting the entrenched racial segregation, often referred to as the 'Color Line' and the 'Black Belt.' Dorothy Roberts found these interviews to be incredibly illuminating, offering insights into the lived experiences of individuals navigating a society deeply divided by race. The transcripts detailed the challenges faced by these couples, including social ostracization, employment discrimination, and the constant negotiation of their public and private lives. It was within this rich archive that Roberts made the surprising and personally impactful discovery of her mother's involvement.

Upon reviewing the transcripts, Roberts uncovered a significant disparity between her parents' interviewing styles and focus. Her father's notes often contained anthropological observations on physical traits, including what he termed 'Negroid traits' and discussions of 'Negroid blood' in children, reflecting the problematic racial theories prevalent in the 1930s. In stark contrast, her mother's interviews revealed a more empathetic and detailed account of the wives' personalities, their domestic lives, and their interactions with their children. Iris's notes were described as vivid and almost cinematic, capturing the emotional depth and daily realities of these women, a dimension largely absent from her husband's more clinical approach. This difference underscored the distinct perspectives they each brought to the study, and for Dorothy, illuminated her mother's significant, though unacknowledged, intellectual contribution.

One particularly striking aspect that emerged from the interviews was the often-romanticized or fetishized perception of interracial relationships and biracial children. Roberts encountered narratives where Black men expressed a preference for white women, suggesting an 'extra excitement' or 'titillation' associated with interracial intimacy. Similarly, the idea that 'whitening' children made them more appealing or intelligent was a recurring, disturbing theme. Roberts admits to a 'visceral revulsion' at these sentiments, which highlight the deep-seated racial biases and the commodification of race within personal relationships. These findings compelled her to challenge simplistic notions of love transcending race, and instead, to advocate for a more nuanced understanding of how societal racism infiltrates even the most intimate connections.

Roberts also reflected on her own past, specifically her decision during college to identify solely as Black and to conceal her white father's racial background. She expressed regret over this choice, recognizing it as a denial of a crucial part of her identity and a disservice to her father's influence. This introspective journey ultimately led her to embrace her full identity as a Black woman with a white father, acknowledging the profound impact he had on her development, particularly in shaping her commitment to combating racism and uplifting Black women. She realized that her father's teachings and their complex family history were instrumental in forging her passion for social justice, and that denying his role would be to deny a fundamental aspect of herself.

Ultimately, 'The Mixed Marriage Project' provided Dorothy Roberts with a powerful framework to understand the enduring legacy of race in America and its intricate connection to personal relationships. The stories of these interracial couples, including her own parents, reveal how the social construct of race can fracture even the strongest family bonds, as exemplified by her uncle's estrangement from her father after his marriage to her mother. The book posits that genuine love across racial divides requires more than mere sentiment; it demands an active engagement with, and dismantling of, structural racism. It is a call to recognize our shared humanity and to commit to the ongoing work necessary to overcome the deeply entrenched systemic barriers that race has imposed on society.

American Skier Ben Ogden Claims Historic Olympic Silver Medal

In a momentous athletic achievement, American cross-country skier Ben Ogden has ended a five-decade-long medal drought for U.S. men in the sport at the Winter Olympics. His remarkable silver-medal performance in the classic sprint event, held in the picturesque Val di Fiemme, Italy, on February 10, 2026, has electrified the sporting world. Ogden's success not only highlights his individual prowess but also marks a significant resurgence for American cross-country skiing on the global stage. This victory is a testament to years of dedication and rigorous training, echoing the legacy of Bill Koch, the last American man to win an Olympic cross-country medal in 1976.

American Skier Ben Ogden Secures Historic Olympic Silver in Val di Fiemme

On Tuesday, February 10, 2026, in the stunning setting of the Tesero Cross-Country Skiing Stadium in Val di Fiemme, Italy, 25-year-old American skier Ben Ogden etched his name into the annals of Olympic history. Ogden, hailing from Vermont, claimed a silver medal in the fiercely contested sprint classic event at the Winter Games. This outstanding accomplishment signifies the first Olympic cross-country skiing medal for an American man in half a century, a feat last achieved by fellow Vermonter Bill Koch at the 1976 Innsbruck Winter Olympics.

Ogden's journey to the podium was a display of consistent strength and tactical brilliance. After confidently qualifying in second place, he navigated through the demanding quarter-finals and semi-finals. In the final heat, comprising six elite skiers, Ogden demonstrated exceptional form, securing his silver medal by finishing just behind the legendary Norwegian Johannes Klaebo, widely regarded as the most decorated cross-country skier of all time. Norway's Oskar Vike earned the bronze, rounding out a highly competitive podium. The U.S. Ski & Snowboard Team swiftly celebrated this historic win, recognizing Ogden's monumental achievement in a jubilant social media announcement.

This marks Ogden's third appearance at the Olympic Games, and his experience undoubtedly played a crucial role in his success. While the men's team celebrated, the U.S. women's cross-country standout, Jessie Diggins, did not advance in her classic sprint races on the same day. However, her teammate Julia Kern made a strong showing, reaching the finals and securing a respectable sixth place finish.

Ben Ogden's silver medal is far more than just a personal triumph; it's a beacon of inspiration for American winter sports. It demonstrates that with persistent effort and unwavering dedication, even the longest droughts can be broken, and new eras of success can begin. This historic moment will undoubtedly ignite greater interest and participation in cross-country skiing across the United States, encouraging a new generation of athletes to chase their Olympic dreams. Ogden's performance underscores the value of resilience and perseverance in the face of daunting challenges, proving that the spirit of competition and the pursuit of excellence truly know no bounds.

See More

Unpacking the True Influence of the Federal Reserve Chair

The position of the Federal Reserve Chair, while seemingly constrained by its structure, actually holds immense influence over the nation's economic trajectory. This article delves into how the Chair, despite possessing only one vote within the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), consistently guides crucial decisions on interest rates and monetary policy. This remarkable sway is rooted in informal powers, including effective communication, executive authority over the Fed's extensive staff, the ability to shape meeting agendas, and a deep-seated tradition of deference from other committee members. Understanding these dynamics is key to appreciating the Fed Chair's profound impact on the economy.

Formally, the Federal Reserve Act establishes a system designed to distribute power, making it appear as though no single individual, including the Chair, could dominate economic policy. For example, the Chair has just one vote on the FOMC, the body responsible for setting interest rates. However, historical data reveals a striking pattern: the Fed Chair has never been outvoted in FOMC decisions, and rarely on the Board of Governors. This consistent unanimity points to a power far exceeding what is explicitly outlined in law.

Economists and former Fed officials shed light on this phenomenon. Alan Blinder, a former Vice Chair of the Fed, emphasizes that while the formal structure suggests limited power, in practice, the Chair possesses "a great deal" of influence. This power, he notes, isn't derived from the Federal Reserve Act itself, but from unwritten norms and practices within the institution. The Chair's role encompasses leadership of both the Board of Governors and, by tradition, the FOMC. While the President appoints the Chair of the Board for four-year terms, the FOMC elects its own chair annually, consistently choosing the Fed Chair.

One crucial source of the Fed Chair's influence lies in their control over communication. As the public face of the Fed, the Chair conducts press conferences and testifies before Congress. This "economic bully pulpit" allows them to shape public perception and market expectations. The financial markets and other committee members are acutely aware of the weight carried by the Chair's pronouncements, which often leads to deference. A Chair's remarks can significantly impact market stability, further cementing their influential position.

Beyond communication, the Fed Chair functions as the de facto CEO of the institution, a role explicitly recognized in the Federal Reserve Act as the "active executive officer." This grants them broad managerial authority, including significant influence over staffing decisions—hiring, firing, and promotions. This executive control enables the Chair to guide which data, analyses, and reports are presented to other Fed authorities prior to critical votes. Lael Brainard, former Vice Chair, noted that while the data itself is accurate, the way it's presented can subtly steer interpretations, especially during economic turning points. This allows the Chair to effectively lobby committee members towards their preferred outcomes.

Another powerful tool at the Chair's disposal is agenda control. Blinder highlights that FOMC and Board meetings are not open discussions but follow a structured agenda set by the Chair. A notable example is Ben Bernanke's tenure during the 2008 financial crisis. With conventional interest rate tools exhausted, Bernanke, leveraging his unique expertise on past economic crises, successfully placed "Quantitative Easing" (QE) — an unconventional monetary policy — on the agenda. His ability to introduce and gain consensus for such a novel approach during a crisis underscored the power of agenda-setting and intellectual leadership.

Furthermore, the long-standing tradition of consensus-building and deference within the Fed significantly contributes to the Chair's power. Officials understand that a unified voice enhances the institution's credibility and effectiveness in the eyes of markets and the public. As Brainard recounts, even when she harbored reservations about raising interest rates in 2015, she ultimately supported Chair Janet Yellen's decision to demonstrate solidarity and uphold the Fed's institutional strength during a pivotal moment.

The Fed Chair's substantial influence stems from a complex interplay of formal executive powers, informal communicative authority, strategic agenda control, and deeply ingrained institutional norms of deference and consensus-building. This blend of explicit and implicit power allows the Chair to effectively guide the central bank's decisions, even in the face of internal disagreements or external political pressures, ultimately shaping the nation's economic landscape.

See More